Notice: Payments for answers will end 4/10/2017. Click for more info.
You have new items in your feed. Click to view.
Question and answer
Q: Judges espousing a philosophy of original understanding maintain that school desegregation cases decided on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment were wrongly decided because (Points : 1) A)
the original intent of the framers was to defer to the will of legislative bodies. B)we do not know that it was ever the intention of the Fourteenth Amendment to end segregation. C) it was only intended to protect the rights of newly freed slaves and not address issues of school segregation. D) originalism is contrary to activism.
A: Judges espousing a philosophy of original understanding maintain that school desegregation cases decided on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment were wrongly decided because we do not know that it was ever the intention of the Fourteenth Amendment [ to end segregation. ]
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: Judges espousing a philosophy of original understanding maintain that school desegregation cases decided on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment were wrongly decided because (Points : 1) A) the original intent of the framers was to defer to the will of legislative bodies. B)we do not know that it was ever the intention of the Fourteenth Amendment to end segregation. C) it was only intended to protect the rights of newly freed slaves and not address issues of school segregation. D) originalism is contrary to activism.

Weegy: Judges espousing a philosophy of original understanding maintain that school desegregation cases decided on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment were wrongly decided because we do not know that it was ever the intention of the Fourteenth Amendment [ to end segregation. ]
OxTornado007|Points 5488|

User: Affirmative action is about (Points : 1) A)making financial amends for slavery. B)achieving a color blind society in America. C)moving the Civil Rights Movement into its next phase by promoting equal opportunity. 4)enrolling more minorities than whites in universities.

Weegy: C)moving the Civil Rights Movement into its next phase by promoting equal opportunity.
Expert answered|arraarceo|Points 85|

User: In Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court ruled that burning the American flag was constitutionally protected speech because (Points : 1) A) burning the flag did not present a clear and present danger. B) the First Amendment is absolute and unlimited. C) it is symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. D) most people no longer salute the flag.

Question
Asked 9/23/2012 7:50:01 PM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
26,995,965 questions answered
*
Get answers from Weegy and a team of really smart lives experts.
Popular Conversations
True or false? Stress has an effect on every system of the body.
Weegy: what is the question?
6/14/2018 12:05:59 PM| 2 Answers
What's 3 * 4
Weegy: Synonyms for the word "say" which are bigger in length and in impact, are communicate, ...
6/16/2018 8:51:59 PM| 2 Answers
S
L
Points 240 [Total 258] Ratings 0 Comments 170 Invitations 7 Offline
S
L
Points 130 [Total 130] Ratings 0 Comments 130 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
R
Points 105 [Total 256] Ratings 1 Comments 5 Invitations 9 Offline
S
R
L
R
P
R
P
R
Points 66 [Total 734] Ratings 0 Comments 6 Invitations 6 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
P
R
P
R
P
P
Points 62 [Total 13329] Ratings 0 Comments 62 Invitations 0 Offline
S
L
1
R
Points 34 [Total 1450] Ratings 2 Comments 14 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 20 [Total 20] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
L
Points 10 [Total 187] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 13] Ratings 0 Comments 10 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 1 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.