Question and answer
explain the coutrs rational and ruling in the hodesh verses korelitz case
HODESH v. KORELITZ HODESH, Appellant, v. KORELITZ et al., Appellees, et al. No. 2008-1133. - August 27, 2009 ........ Bruce Whitman, for appellant.Tucker, Ellis & West, L.L.P., and Irene C. [ Keyse-Walker, Cleveland; and Triona, Calderhead & Lockemeyer and David Calderhead, Cincinnati, for appellees Joel Korelitz, M.D., and Cincinnati General Surgeons, Inc.Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and
Paul W. Flowers, Cleveland; and Elk & Elk Co., Ltd., and Peter D. Traska, Mayfield Heights, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Justice.Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis, L.L.P., Jeffrey M. Hines, and Karen A. Carroll, Cincinnati, urging reversal for amici curiae Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati and Health Alliance of Greater Cincinnati. .......... ]
Expert answered|sujaysen|Points 2156|
Question
Asked 6/15/2012 12:43:04 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
25,068,890 questions answered
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 211 [Total 211] Ratings 8 Comments 131 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 171 [Total 171] Ratings 2 Comments 131 Invitations 2 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
P
R
Points 145 [Total 12397] Ratings 2 Comments 125 Invitations 0 Online
S
L
P
P
P
Points 45 [Total 3422] Ratings 0 Comments 45 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 38 [Total 107] Ratings 0 Comments 38 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 25 [Total 25] Ratings 0 Comments 25 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 10 [Total 10] Ratings 1 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 48] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 1] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.