Question and answer
You see one of your coworkers taking several boxes of pens and pencils from the supply closet when she is not supposed to. What is the most logical reason for her behavior? a. She works from home on
nights and weekends and needs the supplies.b. Pens and pencils are rarely available in the supply closet.c. Some organizations have begun requiring employees to purchase their own pens and pencils.d. Pens and pencils are not expensive, so the company will not miss them.
a. She works from home on nights and weekends and needs the supplies.
Expert answered|uxiali|Points 425|
Question
Asked 8/5/2012 6:05:17 PM
0 Answers/Comments
Get an answer
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right?
Weegy: She gave information leading to the arrest and conviction of the subject. [ She gets the reward (btw no police commissioner is going to offer any reward, let alone $100,000) The policy is that the police do not, and actually cannot legally, offer a reward in most states. The reward and moneys posted have to be from private businesses or individuals. City, taxpayers, money cannot be used. It is also against the law for officers to receive the benefit of rewards. They are public servants, not PI's or bounty hunters. Of course I agree, It is only fair and it is truly the only way to get information from a posted reward. If you do not hold up your end of the reward bargain then rewards will become useless in helping to apprehend and convict offenders. ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:08:06 AM
0 Answers/Comments
can you give your own opinion and show proof of the policy
Weegy: What type of policy are you talking about? User: The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right? What is the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? Do you agree with the policy? Why or why not? (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:12:06 AM
0 Answers/Comments
The Police Commissioner is under pressure to solve a murder and offers $100,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction of the culprit. Mary suspects her neighbor, Phoebe, is the guilty party and calls Bob, a friend and police officer, with her suspicions. When Bob visits Phoebe, she unsuccessfully resists arrest, though Bob is severely injured. Phoebe is ultimately convicted of the murder and assaulting Bob. Mary insists all the reward money belongs to her. Is she right? What is ...
Weegy: She gave information leading to the arrest and conviction of the subject. [ [ She gets the reward (btw no police commissioner is going to offer any reward, let alone $100,000) The policy is that the police do not, and actually cannot legally, offer a reward in most states. The reward and moneys posted have to be from private businesses or individuals. City, taxpayers, money cannot be used. It is also against the law for officers to receive the benefit of rewards. They are public servants, not PI's or bounty hunters. Of course I agree, It is only fair and it is truly the only way to get information from a posted reward. If you do not hold up your end of the reward bargain then rewards will become useless in helping to apprehend and convict offenders SUnshine all Day :) ] User: can you show proof of the policy Weegy: I cannot, Thanks SUnshine all Day :) (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 8:15:33 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy consideration behind the relevant rule? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: Policy considerations may become relevant to the making of The policy consideration behind the relevant rule is; if a judicial decision when the decision cannot be made by reference to established rules, [ [ whether grounded in precedent or even in statute. The Court will then consider the values and policy arguments that are relevant to the articulation of the potential rule (or principle). The Court must make an evaluation of them as a preliminary to articulating the rule to be applied in the instant case. The rule will have an application that extends beyond the parties to the case. Just how far it will extend depends upon its terms, its nature, and subject matter. ] ] (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:08:24 AM
0 Answers/Comments
(2) Do you agree with the policy? That any promises made by any parties must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained for consideration that is something of value received or promised to convince a person to make a deal. WHY/WHY NOT?
Weegy: I somewhat agree. If a certain party makes a promise, it should be evaluated for its legality before it is put into effect. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 7/30/2012 9:11:47 AM
0 Answers/Comments
25,665,433 questions answered
Popular Conversations
What is the study of governmental institutions and processes?
Weegy: executive, legislative, judicial, administrative
7/1/2016 4:40:32 PM| 2 Answers
Not characteristic of or related to English Romanticism is. a. a ...
Weegy: REVOLUTION is not the characteristic or related to english romanticism
7/1/2016 12:48:00 AM| 1 Answers
Work process engineering is: a) another name for downsizing. b) ...
Weegy: C. a continuos improvement method that radically increases an organizations productivity.
7/1/2016 5:53:33 AM| 1 Answers
The Kellogg-Briand Pact was unsuccessful because a. Franco's ...
Weegy: The Kellogg-Briand Pact was unsuccessful because: there was no way for the world powers to enforce the ...
7/1/2016 6:02:16 AM| 1 Answers
Which of the following agreements made war illegal? a. League of ...
Weegy: Kellogg-Briand Pact was an agreement to make war illegal. User: Italy captured Ethiopia to a. expand the ...
7/1/2016 6:04:48 AM| 1 Answers
Paul Revere
7/1/2016 6:46:17 AM| 1 Answers
Weegy Stuff
S
P
Points 12 [Total 762] Ratings 0 Comments 12 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 7 [Total 428] Ratings 0 Comments 7 Invitations 0 Offline
S
P
Points 1 [Total 260] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 0 [Total 0] Ratings 0 Comments 0 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)
Home | Contact | Blog | About | Terms | Privacy | © Purple Inc.