Question and answer
. According to the courts any new evidence seized resulting from unreasonably seized evidence is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 5) Bad evidence
doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine
Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. This is because of the Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine:
Get an answer
Original conversation
User: . According to the courts any new evidence seized resulting from unreasonably seized evidence is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 5) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine

Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. This is because of the Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine:
Expert answered|BooDude77|Points 16|

User: 2. According to the courts any new evidence seized resulting from unreasonably seized evidence is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 5) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine Illegal seizure doctrine Unreasonable search doctrine

Weegy: This is based on the Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine: [ ]
Expert answered|BooDude77|Points 16|

User: Which of the following is not a requirement for a plain view search to be legal? (Points : 5) Officer is where he has a legal right to be Evidence is in plain view Evidence is inadvertently discovered Evidence is found after a limited search

Weegy: Evidence is in plain view is not a requirement for a plain view search to be legal.
Expert answered|BooDude77|Points 16|

Question|Rated bad
Asked 8/10/2012 9:58:35 AM
0 Answers/Comments
New answers
Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment
Log in or sign up first.
Questions asked by the same visitor
A basic function of a forensic scientist includes: (Points : 5) Furnishing training on the proper collection of physical evidence Analysis of physical evidence Providing expert testimony All of the above User: According to the courts any new evidence seized resulting from unreasonably seized evidence is also tainted and is not admissible in court. This is based on the: (Points : 5) Bad evidence doctrine Fruits of the poisonous tree doctrine ...
Weegy: Stolen evidence is not admissible because it could be tampered with once it was stolen. This is because of the Fruits of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine: User: What is a decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court that becomes the law of the land and serves as a precedent for similar legal issues? (Points : 5) Evidentiary decision Procedural decision Situational decision Landmark decision Weegy: The answer is Landmark decision. (More)
Question
Expert Answered
Asked 8/10/2012 10:24:59 AM
0 Answers/Comments
23,845,152 questions answered
Popular Conversations
Weegy Stuff
S
Points 171 [Total 568] Ratings 0 Comments 171 Invitations 0 Online
S
P
P
Points 142 [Total 949] Ratings 0 Comments 142 Invitations 0 Offline
S
1
L
L
P
R
P
L
P
Points 106 [Total 11279] Ratings 0 Comments 106 Invitations 0 Online
S
L
P
Points 46 [Total 2114] Ratings 0 Comments 46 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 7 [Total 17] Ratings 0 Comments 7 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 904] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 4 [Total 4] Ratings 0 Comments 4 Invitations 0 Offline
S
R
Points 2 [Total 438] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 2 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 2 Invitations 0 Offline
S
Points 1 [Total 2] Ratings 0 Comments 1 Invitations 0 Offline
* Excludes moderators and previous
winners (Include)