At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, including the defendants in cases such as Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001), argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, music, and books in digital form to make limited copies for fair use. Which side of this debate do you support? Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue?

Question and answer

At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, including the defendants in cases such as Universal City Studios, Inc. v.

Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001), argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, music, and books in digital form to make limited copies for fair use. Which side of this debate do you support? Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue?

i think that if you purchase any media you should be able to make personnel copies of it unlimited because it the value of the media usually decreases after opening it anyway and because it is necessary to have a back up copy! however i do think it [ would be tough to find a common ground on the decision. ]

Ask a question

Not a good answer? Get an answer now. (FREE)

Original conversation

User: At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, including the defendants in cases such as Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001), argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, music, and books in digital form to make limited copies for fair use. Which side of this debate do you support? Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue?

Weegy: i think that if you purchase any media you should be able to make personnel copies of it unlimited because it the value of the media usually decreases after opening it anyway and because it is necessary to have a back up copy! however i do think it [ would be tough to find a common ground on the decision. ]
Expert answered|amandaphil29|Points 0|

User: At issue in the twenty-first century is the trade-off between the necessity of writers, musicians, artists, and movie studios to profit from their work and the free flow of ideas for the public benefit. Movie (and music) industry participants claim that encryption programs are necessary to prevent piracy. Others, however, including the defendants in cases such as Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001), argue that the law should at least allow purchasers of movies, music, and books in digital form to make limited copies for fair use. Which side of this debate do you support? Is it possible to strike an appropriate balance between the rights of both groups on this issue?

Question

Asked 4/19/2012 11:37:16 PM

0 Answers/Comments

New answers

Rating

There are no new answers.

Comments

There are no comments.

Add an answer or comment

Ask Weegy a question. Search archive.

Questions asked by the same visitor

Discuss in detail the various scientific disciplines within the field of forensic science?

Weegy: Please contact Weegy Research for this question, as it requires in depth research. (More)

Question

Education|No Subcategories|Expert Answered

Asked 4/16/2012 10:54:51 AM

0 Answers/Comments

disciplines of forensic science

Weegy: Here are the 5 most common disciplines within forensic science and what each one entails. 1. Forensic Anthropology 2. Forensic Psychology 3. Forensic Toxicology 4. Forensic Odontology 5. Cyber Forensics (More)

Question

All Categories|No Subcategories|Expert Answered

Asked 4/16/2012 11:03:07 AM

0 Answers/Comments

Discuss in detail the various scientific disciplines within the field of forensic science?

Weegy: The first treatise describing the application of scientific disciplines to the field of criminal investigation was written by Hans Gross in 1893. [ In his book Criminal Investigation, he detailed the assistance that investigators could expect from the fields of microscopy, chemistry, physics, mineralogy, zoology, botany, anatomy and physiology, and fingerprinting. ] (More)

Question

All Categories|No Subcategories|Expert Answered

Asked 4/16/2012 10:53:15 AM

0 Answers/Comments

What is terrorism; what has it been, and what will it be like in the twenty first century?

Weegy: Terrorism is not new, and even though it has been used since the beginning of recorded history it can be relatively hard to define. [ Terrorism has been described variously as both a tactic and strategy; a crime and a holy duty; a justified reaction to oppression and an inexcusable abomination. Obviously, a lot depends on whose point of view is being represented. Terrorism has often been an effective tactic for the weaker side in a ... (More)

Question

Education|No Subcategories|Expert Answered

Asked 4/16/2012 12:04:09 PM

0 Answers/Comments

do Public servants dedicate their lives to serving the People

Weegy: yes. some Public servants dedicate their lives to serving the People (More)

Question

Advice|No Subcategories|Expert Answered

Asked 4/16/2012 6:00:12 PM

0 Answers/Comments